The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence presents both unprecedented opportunities and profound challenges, particularly for the delicate ecosystems of small businesses, entrepreneurs, solopreneurs, individual content creators, artists, and small communities. While the potential for AI to revolutionize industries is undeniable, the current trajectory, marked by the unchecked growth of massive mono corporations and governmental policies that often overlook the needs of smaller entities, raises serious concerns. Specifically, the practice of permitting AI to train on copyrighted material without equitable consideration for the rights of creators fundamentally alters the landscape of intellectual property. This shift, while propelling AI development, risks undermining the livelihoods and creative rights of those who rely on their intellectual property for sustenance. It creates a stark imbalance, where corporations like OpenAI and Google gain access to vast resources, while individual creators and small businesses, the lifeblood of innovation and cultural production, face potential economic devastation. This introduction aims to explore the multifaceted consequences of this imbalance, examining not only its impact on global AI competition and ethical AI growth, but also its potential to reshape the very foundation of creative rights for individuals, communities, organizations, and corporations, both today and in the future.

OpenAI’s Policy Recommendations

“OpenAI’s proposals for the U.S. AI Action Plan. Recommendations build on OpenAI’s Economic Blueprint to strengthen America’s AI leadership. Global Affairs. March 13, 2025″ is summarized by Google Gemini Advanced 2.0 Flash on March 17th 2025 at 8:45 a.m., e.s.t. as follows:

The article summarizes OpenAI’s policy recommendations submitted to the White House Office of Science and Technology (OSTP) for the U.S. AI Action Plan.¹ These recommendations are designed to strengthen American AI leadership while ensuring “freedom of intelligence.” Key proposals include:

• Regulatory Strategy:
  • Advocates for a flexible, voluntary partnership between the government and private sector to encourage innovation.²
  • Aims to prevent overly burdensome state laws that could benefit China (PRC).
• Export Control Strategy:
  • Promotes the global adoption of American AI systems in democratic countries.
  • Uses export controls to protect America’s AI advantage, including updates to the AI diffusion rule.³
• Copyright Strategy:
  • Seeks to balance the rights of content creators with the need to maintain America’s AI leadership.⁴
  • Emphasizes the importance of allowing American AI models to learn from copyrighted material to avoid falling behind the PRC.⁵
  • Protecting the freedom to learn.
• Infrastructure Strategy:
  • Calls for investment in infrastructure to support AI development and compete with the PRC.⁶
  • Focuses on job creation, economic growth, energy grid modernization, and workforce training.
• Government Adoption Strategy:
  • Encourages the U.S. government to adopt AI tools to improve efficiency and security.⁷
  • Highlights the need to keep pace with the PRC’s AI adoption in public administration, security, and military.⁸

Essentially, OpenAI is pushing for policies that promote innovation, protect national security, and ensure the widespread benefits of AI, while also allowing AI to learn from available data, including copyrighted works.⁹

OpenAI’s Economic Blueprint

Op̱enAI’s Economic Blueprint, February 2025 Update: Advancing AI Education is summarized by Google Gemini Advanced 2.0 Flash on March 17th 2025 at 8:51 a.m., e.s.t. as follows:

This document, OpenAI’s “Economic Blueprint,” outlines the company’s vision for maximizing the benefits of artificial intelligence in the United States, emphasizing economic growth, national security, and responsible development.¹ Key points include:

• Core Beliefs:
  • America’s strength lies in innovation.
  • The U.S. must lead in AI to counter autocratic influences.²
  • AI should be developed and regulated based on democratic values.³
  • Common-sense rules are needed to safeguard the public while fostering innovation.
• Competitiveness and Security:
  • Prioritizes national competitiveness, model safeguards, and national security.⁴
  • Advocates for a federal strategy to manage the development and export of “frontier models” (highly advanced AI).
  • Calls for government-industry collaboration, including information sharing and streamlined regulations.⁵
  • Promote the sharing of AI technology with allied nations.
• Rules of the Road:
  • Stresses the importance of responsible AI development and use.
  • Focuses on child safety, content provenance (knowing where content comes from), and user preferences.
  • Encourages collaboration between government and industry to address potential harms.⁶
  • Promotes AI literacy.
• Infrastructure as Destiny:
  • Emphasizes the need for significant investment in AI infrastructure, including energy, chips, and data.⁷
  • Proposes policies to encourage infrastructure development, such as AI Economic Zones and a National AI Infrastructure Highway.⁸
  • Calls for a nationwide AI education strategy to prepare the workforce.
  • Protecting the ability for AI models to learn from Publicly available information.
  • Modernizing the energy grid.

In essence, OpenAI is advocating for a comprehensive, government-supported approach to AI development that prioritizes American leadership, economic growth, and responsible innovation.⁹

OpenAI’s Proposal to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP)

The proposal is summarized by Google Gemini Advanced 2.0 Flash on March 17th 2025 at 8:51 a.m., e.s.t. as follows:

This document is a proposal from OpenAI to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) regarding the U.S. AI Action Plan, under the context of a Trump administration in 2025.¹ It emphasizes maintaining American leadership in AI, especially in competition with China. Key points include:

• Emphasis on National Security and Economic Dominance:
  • The document aligns with the stated policy of the U.S. to “sustain and enhance America’s global dominance.”
  • It highlights the urgency of competing with China’s AI advancements, particularly DeepSeek’s R1 model.
• Focus on “Democratic AI”:
  • OpenAI advocates for AI development based on democratic principles, including free markets, user freedom, and prevention of government misuse.²
• Key Proposals:
  • Preemption: A federal framework for voluntary partnership with the private sector, offering relief from state-level regulations.³
  • Export Controls: A strategy to promote the global adoption of American AI while restricting access for adversarial nations (especially China).⁴ This includes a tier system for countries based on their alignment with “democratic AI principles”.
  • Copyright: Protection of the “fair use” doctrine to allow AI models to learn from copyrighted material, maintaining American competitiveness.⁵
  • Infrastructure: Investment in AI infrastructure, including data centers, transmission lines, and workforce development.⁶
  • Government Adoption: Streamlining government adoption of AI tools through modernized cybersecurity rules and procurement processes.⁷
• Statistics Provided:
  • “Globally, most ChatGPT users are under age 35; in the US, about one third are ages 18 to 24.”
  • “More than seven in 10 parents in the US believe children today will be worse off financially than they are.”
  • “Nine in 10 US parents think it’s important that their kids learn how to use artificial intelligence for their future jobs—and eight in 10 say either that isn’t happening today, or they don’t know if it is.”
  • “Three in four college-age AI users want to use AI in their education and careers.”
  • “More than 400 million people around the world are using ChatGPT.”
  • “3 million developers” are using openai products.⁸
  • “781 and counting proposed AI-related bills already introduced this year in US states.”

The document frames AI as a critical technology for national security and economic prosperity, advocating for policies that support American leadership and counter Chinese influence.

REFERENCES

• A Buick. Dec 12th 2024, Copyright and AI training data—transparency to the rescue?
• CSIS. Nov 13th 2024, Ensuring U.S. Leadership in AI: Industry Perspective on Data Center Growth
• D Kelly, Oct 31st 2024, Why America must win the Artificial Intelligence Race
• F D’Souza, Mar 13th 2025, OpenAI’s OSTP submission
• Inside AI Policy, Mar 17 2025, OpenAI ‘blueprint’ calls for industry leadership, ‘responsible’ exports
• J Nosta. July 25th 2023, The AI Paradox. Navigating between unprecedented opportunity and unseen threats.
• MoniGarr, Oct 28th 2025, Future proofing AI governance lessons from the OpenAI Restructure
• OpenAI , Mar 13th 2025, OpenAI’s proposals for the U.S. AI Action Plan
• OpenAI, Feb 25th 2025, OpenAI’s Economic Blueprint, Advancing AI Education
• R HeilWeil. Nov 13th 2024, Fedscoop, OpenAI’s new policy blueprint for AI imagines a role for government,
• T Philp. Nov 1st 2024, AI raises questions about copyright